Cockpit
Self-HostedOpen-source self-hosted conference management system
Overview
Cockpit streamlines conference organization with self-hosted tools for call for papers (CFP) management, attendee registration, speaker coordination, and schedule publishing. It supports Docker deployment for easy setup on Linux servers, giving organizers full control over data privacy. Features include customizable submission forms, review workflows, ticket sales integration, and public schedule pages. Ideal for small to medium-sized conferences seeking an alternative to proprietary SaaS platforms.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
cockpit:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: cockpit
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Call for Papers (CFP) workflow automation
- Attendee registration & ticketing system
- Speaker profile management & schedule building
- Docker-based deployment for simplified setup
- Customizable submission review process
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is Cockpit hard to install?
Cockpit offers Docker deployment, which simplifies installation for most users. Manual setup requires PHP/MySQL and basic command-line skills, but Docker images reduce complexity to a few commands. Documentation guides cover both methods.
? Is it a good alternative to Eventbrite?
Yes, if you prioritize data privacy and cost savings. It lacks Eventbrite’s advanced marketing tools but excels at core conference tasks like CFP handling and schedule management without recurring fees.
? Is it completely free?
Yes, Cockpit is open-source (licensed under MIT/GPL) and free to use, modify, and self-host. There are no hidden costs or paid tiers for core features.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about Cockpit
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Full data control via self-hosting
- ⊕ No recurring subscription fees
- ⊕ Open-source code for customization
- ⊕ Supports payment gateway integration
Cons
- ⊖ Requires basic server administration knowledge
- ⊖ Limited marketing automation compared to SaaS tools
- ⊖ Smaller user community than major platforms