Digibunch
Self-HostedOpen-source bookmark manager for organizing and sharing links
Overview
Digibunch is a lightweight, open-source bookmark manager built for self-hosting. It lets users organize links into custom collections, add tags for quick retrieval, and share bookmarks publicly or privately. With support for importing/exporting via HTML/JSON, migrating from other tools is seamless. Deploy using Docker for a hassle-free setup or manual installation on PHP/MySQL servers—ideal for users who want full control over their bookmark data without relying on third-party services.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
digibunch:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: digibunch
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Organize links into customizable collections and tags
- Import/export bookmarks via HTML and JSON formats
- Share collections publicly or privately with others
- Fast full-text search for quick bookmark retrieval
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is Digibunch hard to install?
Digibunch is easy to install using Docker—pull the official image and run it with minimal configuration. Manual setup requires PHP and MySQL, but the GitHub repo provides clear step-by-step instructions for both methods.
? Is it a good alternative to Pocket?
Yes—Digibunch offers core bookmarking features like organization and search, plus self-hosted privacy which Pocket lacks. While it doesn’t have Pocket’s read-later offline feature, it’s perfect for users prioritizing data ownership.
? Is it completely free?
Digibunch is 100% free and open-source. There are no hidden costs, premium tiers, or paywalls—all features are available to self-hosters without any fees.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about Digibunch
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Privacy-focused (self-hosted data control)
- ⊕ No recurring subscription fees
- ⊕ Lightweight and low-resource usage
Cons
- ⊖ Requires basic server setup (Docker or manual deployment)
- ⊖ Limited mobile support (web-only interface)
- ⊖ Fewer advanced features than SaaS alternatives like Raindrop.io