Feedmixer
Self-HostedOpen-source tool to merge multiple RSS feeds into a single feed for automation workflows
Overview
Feedmixer is an open-source automation tool that unifies multiple RSS/Atom feeds into one. It supports content filtering (keywords/regex), customizable update intervals, and outputs merged feeds as RSS 2.0 or JSON. Deployable via Docker or precompiled binaries, it integrates with tools like IFTTT/Zapier via feed URLs. Features include scheduled auto-updates, sorting options (newest/oldest), and lightweight resource usage—ideal for streamlining content or feeding aggregated data into automation pipelines.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
feedmixer:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: feedmixer
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Merge multiple RSS/Atom feeds into a unified output
- Custom content filtering (keywords/regex) and sorting
- Output as RSS 2.0 or JSON for cross-tool compatibility
- Easy deployment via Docker or precompiled binaries
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is Feedmixer hard to install?
No—Feedmixer can be deployed quickly with Docker (simple `docker run` command) or precompiled binaries for Linux/macOS/Windows. It needs only a YAML config file listing input feeds and output settings to start merging.
? Is it a good alternative to Zapier's RSS Mixer?
Yes—Feedmixer offers more control over filtering/output than Zapier’s free tier, no limits on feeds/updates, and self-hosted privacy. It integrates with Zapier/IFTTT via its merged feed URL for extended automation.
? Is it completely free?
Yes—Feedmixer uses the MIT License, so it’s 100% free to use, modify, and self-host without hidden costs or subscriptions.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about Feedmixer
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Privacy-focused (self-hosted, no third-party data sharing)
- ⊕ No subscription fees (100% open-source MIT license)
Cons
- ⊖ Requires basic server setup (Docker/binary deployment)
- ⊖ Limited graphical UI (primarily config-file driven)