FileBrowser

Self-Hosted

Open-source web-based file manager for easy server file access and management

Visit Website

Overview

FileBrowser is an open-source web-based file manager that lets you manage server files via an intuitive interface. Features include upload/download, renaming, moving, deleting files, sharing with public links, and user permission controls. It supports multiple authentication methods (username/password, OAuth) and works with local storage or cloud backends like S3. Deploy easily using Docker (one-line command), binary files, or as a service. Lightweight and customizable (themes, language support), it’s ideal for self-hosters needing a simple alternative to FTP/SSH for file access.

Self-Hosting Resources

Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml. ⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.

docker-compose.template.yml TEMPLATE

version: '3'
services:
  filebrowser:
    image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
    container_name: filebrowser
    ports:
      - "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
    volumes:
      - ./data:/app/data
    restart: unless-stopped

Key Features

  • Web-based file operations (upload, download, rename)
  • User permission management and multiple auth methods
  • Easy deployment via Docker or binary files

Frequently Asked Questions

? Is FileBrowser hard to install?

No—FileBrowser has straightforward deployment options, including a single Docker command, precompiled binaries, or package managers. Official documentation provides clear steps for various setups, making it accessible for users with basic server knowledge.

? Is it a good alternative to Dropbox's web interface?

Yes—FileBrowser offers core web-based file management features (upload, download, share links) but is self-hosted, so you retain full ownership of your data. It lacks Dropbox’s collaboration tools (like real-time editing) but excels at managing local server files without third-party dependencies.

? Is it completely free?

Yes—FileBrowser is open-source under the MIT License, meaning it’s free to use, modify, and self-host. There are no paid tiers or hidden costs associated with the software.

Top Alternatives

Dropbox Web Interface Search Google
Google Drive Compare
OneDrive Web Access Search Google

People Also Ask about FileBrowser

FileBrowser vs Dropbox Web InterfaceFileBrowser vs Google DriveFileBrowser vs OneDrive Web Access FileBrowser 2025 review FileBrowser docker-compose example

Tool Info

Pricing Free/Open Source
Platform Self-Hosted

Pros

  • Self-hosted (full control over data)
  • Simple and intuitive user interface
  • Customizable themes and language support

Cons

  • Requires server setup and maintenance
  • Limited collaboration features compared to enterprise tools
  • No built-in end-to-end encryption for file transfers

More File Transfer - Web-based File Managers Tools