HandBrake Web
Self-HostedWeb-based interface for HandBrake to automate video transcoding workflows
Overview
HandBrake Web is a self-hosted web UI for the HandBrake video transcoder, enabling automated batch processing and watch folder tasks. It supports diverse input/output formats (MP4, MKV, HEVC), customizable encoding presets, and integration with local/cloud storage. Deployable via Docker for simplified setup, it lets users automate media conversion (e.g., library re-encoding) while retaining full data control. The interface streamlines HandBrake CLI configuration, making it accessible for both beginners and advanced users.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
handbrake_web:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: handbrake-web
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Web UI for HandBrake's transcoding capabilities
- Batch processing & watch folder automation
- Customizable encoding presets
- Docker deployment for quick self-hosting
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is HandBrake Web hard to install?
It’s easy with Docker—use the official container image to avoid dependency issues. Manual installation requires setting up HandBrake CLI and a web server, which is more technical but well-documented in the repo.
? Is it a good alternative to CloudConvert?
Yes—if you prefer self-hosting for privacy/control, it offers similar transcoding features without recurring costs. CloudConvert has more cloud integrations, but HandBrake Web is better for local/self-managed workflows.
? Is it completely free?
Yes—HandBrake Web (based on the open-source Docker image) is free to use with no hidden fees or subscription requirements.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about HandBrake Web
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Self-hosted (privacy-focused data control)
- ⊕ No subscription fees
- ⊕ Supports diverse video formats
- ⊕ Simplifies CLI-based transcoding
Cons
- ⊖ CPU/GPU-intensive (requires powerful server)
- ⊖ Technical setup (Docker or manual configuration)
- ⊖ Performance depends on hardware specs
- ⊖ Limited cloud sync vs. SaaS tools