LinkAce
Self-HostedSelf-hosted bookmark manager with tagging, archiving, and broken link checks
Overview
LinkAce is an open-source, self-hosted bookmark manager designed to organize, store, and share links securely. It supports tagging, categorization, and full-text search for quick content retrieval. Users can archive links locally for offline access and automate broken link monitoring to keep their collection up-to-date. Deployment is straightforward via Docker, Docker Compose, or traditional PHP/MySQL setups with detailed documentation. It also offers REST API access for tool integrations and multi-user management for shared collections. Ideal for those prioritizing data privacy over cloud-based services like Pocket or Raindrop.io.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
linkace:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: linkace
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Tagging & Categorization
- Local Link Archiving
- Broken Link Monitoring
- REST API Integration
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is LinkAce hard to install?
LinkAce is easy to install using Docker or Docker Compose, which requires minimal configuration. For non-Docker users, it needs PHP (8.1+), MySQL/MariaDB, and a web server like Nginx—all steps are well-documented in the official guide.
? Is LinkAce a good alternative to Pocket?
Yes! It offers core bookmarking features plus self-hosted privacy, local archiving, and broken link checks (missing in Pocket’s free tier). It’s perfect for users who want full control over their data instead of relying on cloud services.
? Is LinkAce completely free?
Absolutely—LinkAce is open-source under the MIT License, so it’s free to use, modify, and self-host with no hidden fees or premium tiers.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about LinkAce
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Privacy-focused data ownership
- ⊕ Open-source and customizable
- ⊕ Simplified Docker deployment
Cons
- ⊖ Requires self-hosting (server needed)
- ⊖ No native mobile app
- ⊖ Initial setup may need basic technical skills