Loomio
Self-HostedOpen-source collaborative decision-making platform for groups
Overview
Loomio is an open-source tool for teams and communities to make collaborative decisions transparently. It supports structured discussions, proposal creation, and inclusive voting (consensus, majority, etc.) to align groups on key choices. Features include threaded comments, deadline-setting for proposals, role-based permissions, and integrations with Slack/Matrix. Deployable via Docker or manual setup on your server, it prioritizes data privacy and control, ideal for self-hosted environments avoiding proprietary tools.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
loomio:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: loomio
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Structured decision-making (proposals + inclusive voting)
- Threaded discussions with comment replies
- Role-based access and deadline management
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is Loomio hard to install?
Loomio can be installed easily via Docker (official image available), which minimizes setup effort. For manual installation, official docs provide step-by-step guides for server deployment, though basic Linux/command-line knowledge is helpful.
? Is it a good alternative to Slack for decision-making?
Yes—unlike Slack (which lacks structured decision tools), Loomio is built specifically for transparent, inclusive decisions with formal proposals and voting, making it better for teams needing intentional alignment over casual chats.
? Is Loomio completely free?
The self-hosted version is 100% free and open-source (MIT license). Loomio also offers a hosted paid plan with extra features like priority support, but self-hosting requires no subscription fees.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about Loomio
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Privacy-focused (self-hostable for full data control)
- ⊕ Inclusive voting methods (supports consensus)
- ⊕ Integrates with Slack/Matrix for workflow continuity
Cons
- ⊖ Requires technical setup for self-hosting
- ⊖ Smaller ecosystem vs. mainstream collaborative tools
- ⊖ Limited advanced reporting features