MiroTalk SFU

Self-Hosted

Open-source WebRTC SFU for privacy-focused real-time video conferencing

Overview

MiroTalk SFU is a self-hosted WebRTC Selective Forwarding Unit enabling low-latency, high-quality video/audio calls for up to 100+ participants. It supports screen sharing, text chat, file transfer, and call recording. Deploy via Docker (one-click setup) or manual installation to retain full control over data privacy. Scalable for small teams, webinars, or virtual events, it integrates with APIs for custom workflows. Open-source under MIT license, it’s free to use and modify without third-party dependencies.

Self-Hosting Resources

Find Official Image on Docker Hub View Source & Docs

Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml. ⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.

docker-compose.template.yml TEMPLATE


version: '3'
services:
  mirotalk_sfu:
    image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
    container_name: mirotalk-sfu
    ports:
      - "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
    volumes:
      - ./data:/app/data
    restart: unless-stopped

Key Features

Low-latency group calls (100+ participants)
Screen sharing, chat, file transfer & recording
Docker-based one-click deployment
API integration for custom workflows

Frequently Asked Questions

? Is MiroTalk SFU hard to install?

No—deploy in minutes with a single Docker command, ideal for non-technical users. Manual installation is also available for those wanting more control over the setup.

? Is it a good alternative to Zoom?

Yes—perfect for teams prioritizing privacy and self-hosting. It offers core features like group calls and screen sharing, though it lacks some enterprise tools (e.g., built-in SSO) that can be added via custom API integrations.

? Is it completely free?

Yes! MiroTalk SFU is open-source under the MIT License. You can self-host, modify its code, and use it without any cost or subscription fees.

Top Alternatives

Zoom Search Google

Google Meet Search Google

Microsoft Teams Compare

Tool Info

Pricing Free/Open Source

Category Communication - Video Conferencing

Platform Self-Hosted

Pros

⊕ Full data privacy (self-hosted, no third-party access)
⊕ No subscription fees (open-source MIT license)
⊕ Scalable for small to large groups
⊕ Easy Docker setup for non-technical users

Cons

⊖ Requires a server with WebRTC support
⊖ Advanced scaling needs technical expertise
⊖ Lacks built-in enterprise features like SSO (can integrate via API)