Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)
Self-HostedHigh-performance open-source routing engine for maps
Overview
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) is a fast routing engine that provides directions for cars, bikes, pedestrians, and limited transit using OpenStreetMap (OSM) data. Key features include matrix routing (distance/duration between points), GPS track matching to roads, and nearest point lookup. Deployable via Docker or source, it supports custom OSM extracts for regional/local use. Ideal for apps needing privacy-focused, cost-free routing without proprietary APIs like Google Maps.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
open_source_routing_machine_osrm:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: open-source-routing-machine-osrm
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- High-speed routing for car, bike, foot, and limited transit
- Integrates with OpenStreetMap (OSM) data for global coverage
- Matrix routing (distance/duration between multiple points)
- GPS track matching to road networks
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) hard to install?
OSRM can be installed via Docker (simpler) or from source (technical). Docker handles dependencies, but processing large OSM datasets needs significant storage/CPU. Documentation offers step-by-step guides for both methods.
? Is it a good alternative to Google Maps Directions API?
Yes—great for privacy, no API costs, or custom routing. Uses free OSM data but lacks Google's real-time traffic (without add-ons) or full multi-modal transit in all regions.
? Is it completely free?
Yes—OSRM is MIT-licensed open-source with no fees. Hosting costs (server, storage) apply if self-hosted, but there are no licensing or usage charges.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Privacy-focused (no third-party data sharing)
- ⊕ Free and open-source (MIT License)
- ⊕ Customizable with local/regional OSM extracts
- ⊕ Scalable for high-traffic applications
Cons
- ⊖ Requires technical setup (data processing, server config)
- ⊖ No built-in frontend (needs mapping library integration)
- ⊖ Limited real-time traffic (unless paired with external data)
- ⊖ Less advanced transit support than proprietary alternatives