Polaris
Self-HostedOpen-source self-hosted music streaming server
Overview
Polaris is an open-source self-hosted music streaming server that lets you access your personal audio library from anywhere. It supports popular formats like FLAC, MP3, WAV, and OGG, with features including playlist management, artist/album browsing, search, and user access control. Compatible with Subsonic clients, it works on mobile devices and third-party apps. Deployment is simplified via Docker, or manual installation on Linux servers. It prioritizes privacy, keeping your music library on your hardware without external service reliance.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
polaris:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: polaris
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Stream personal audio library remotely
- Supports FLAC, MP3, WAV, and OGG formats
- Subsonic API compatibility for client apps
- User access control and playlist management
- Docker deployment support
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is Polaris hard to install?
Polaris is easy to install via Docker, which packages all dependencies. Manual installation on Linux requires Python and basic libraries, but official documentation provides clear, step-by-step guides for both methods.
? Is it a good alternative to Subsonic?
Yes! Polaris supports the Subsonic API, so you can use the same client apps as Subsonic, while being open-source and self-hosted—giving you full control over your music library without proprietary lock-in.
? Is it completely free?
Absolutely! Polaris is licensed under the MIT License, meaning it’s free to use, modify, and self-host with no subscription fees or hidden costs.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about Polaris
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Privacy-focused (full control over your data)
- ⊕ No subscription fees
- ⊕ Works with Subsonic mobile/desktop clients
- ⊕ Lightweight and resource-efficient
Cons
- ⊖ Limited to personal library (no curated content)
- ⊖ Requires basic server maintenance
- ⊖ Fewer advanced features than commercial alternatives