socks5-proxy-server
Self-HostedLightweight open-source SOCKS5 proxy server for self-hosting
Overview
A lightweight, open-source SOCKS5 proxy server designed for self-hosting. It supports basic username/password authentication, IPv4/IPv6 connectivity, and UDP associate requests. Easy to deploy via Docker (with a single command) or compile from source using Go. Ideal for users who want to route traffic through their own server to bypass restrictions or enhance privacy. Configurable via a simple YAML file or CLI flags, it offers flexibility without unnecessary bloat. Its minimal footprint works well on low-power devices like Raspberry Pi and integrates with most SOCKS5-compatible clients.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
socks5_proxy_server:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: socks5-proxy-server
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Basic username/password authentication
- IPv4/IPv6 and UDP associate support
- Docker and source-based deployment options
- Configurable via YAML or CLI arguments
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is socks5-proxy-server hard to install?
No—deploy via Docker with a pre-built image (one command) or compile from source using Go. Configuration uses simple files/CLI flags, making it accessible for users with basic server knowledge.
? Is it a good alternative to proprietary SOCKS5 proxies?
Yes—if you prioritize self-hosting and data control. Unlike proprietary options, it doesn’t log traffic (by default) and runs on your server, avoiding third-party surveillance. It lacks advanced features like built-in TLS or load balancing found in paid services, though.
? Is it completely free?
Yes—socks5-proxy-server is open-source under the MIT license. It’s free to use, modify, and distribute without subscriptions or hidden fees.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about socks5-proxy-server
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Open-source (MIT license, no cost)
- ⊕ Low resource consumption
- ⊕ Straightforward setup for server-savvy users
- ⊕ No third-party traffic logging by default
Cons
- ⊖ No built-in TLS encryption (requires external tunneling for security)
- ⊖ Limited advanced features (no load balancing or caching)
- ⊖ Minimal user interface (configuration via files/CLI)
- ⊖ Requires manual firewall setup for external access