Static Web Server
Self-HostedLightweight, cross-platform static file server for self-hosting
Overview
Static Web Server is a fast, secure static file server optimized for self-hosting. It supports HTTP/2, gzip/brotli compression, CORS configuration, custom headers, and directory listing. Resource-efficient, it runs smoothly on low-power devices (like Raspberry Pi) or cloud instances. Deploy via Docker containers, prebuilt binaries (Linux/macOS/Windows), or systemd services. Configurable via CLI flags, environment variables, or TOML files—ideal for serving static sites, documentation, or media assets without bloat.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
static_web_server:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: static-web-server
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- HTTP/2 & HTTPS support
- Gzip/Brotli compression
- CORS & custom header configuration
- Directory listing
- Resource-efficient design
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is Static Web Server hard to install?
No—installation is straightforward. You can use a single Docker command, download prebuilt binaries for your OS (Linux, macOS, Windows), or set it up as a systemd service. Configuration options include CLI flags, environment variables, or a simple TOML file.
? Is it a good alternative to Nginx for static files?
Yes—for static content, it’s an excellent lightweight alternative. It uses fewer resources and includes modern features like HTTP/2 and compression by default. However, if you need dynamic content or advanced reverse proxy capabilities, Nginx is more suitable.
? Is Static Web Server completely free?
Yes—it’s open source under the MIT License, so it’s free to use, modify, and distribute for both personal and commercial purposes with no hidden costs.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about Static Web Server
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Simple deployment via Docker or prebuilt binaries
- ⊕ Low resource usage for edge devices
- ⊕ Modern features out of the box
Cons
- ⊖ No dynamic content processing
- ⊖ Less advanced than heavyweight servers like Nginx
- ⊖ Smaller community compared to established tools