TimeTagger
Self-HostedOpen-source time tracking with intuitive visualizations
Overview
TimeTagger is an open-source time tracking tool focused on simplicity and clarity. It allows logging time with customizable tags, visualizing activity via interactive charts (daily/weekly summaries, tag breakdowns), and integrating Pomodoro sessions for focused work. Deploy easily using Docker Compose, run it on your own server, or use the lightweight standalone Python version. It supports data export (CSV/JSON) and has a responsive UI for desktop/mobile. Perfect for freelancers or individuals wanting privacy-focused time tracking without vendor lock-in.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
timetagger:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: timetagger
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Tag-based time logging with flexible categorization
- Interactive visual reports (charts, activity breakdowns)
- Simple deployment via Docker Compose or standalone setup
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is TimeTagger hard to install?
No—you can deploy it using Docker Compose with a single config file, or run the standalone Python server. Official docs provide step-by-step instructions for both options, making setup accessible even for beginners.
? Is it a good alternative to Toggl Track?
Yes—TimeTagger offers core time tracking features (tagging, reports) with self-hosting benefits and no subscription costs. While it lacks advanced Toggl features like team billing, it’s ideal for users prioritizing privacy and simplicity.
? Is it completely free?
Yes—TimeTagger is open source under the MIT license, so it’s 100% free to self-host. There are no hidden fees or premium tiers for core functionality.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about TimeTagger
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Privacy-focused (data stays on your server)
- ⊕ No subscription fees (100% open source)
Cons
- ⊖ Requires basic server knowledge for self-hosting
- ⊖ Limited advanced team features compared to SaaS tools