WeddingShare
Self-HostedOpen-source wedding photo gallery for guests to share memories
Overview
WeddingShare is an open-source, self-hosted photo gallery tailored for weddings. It enables guests to upload photos/videos via QR code or link, while couples maintain full privacy control (password protection, guest access limits). Features include responsive mobile design, comment/like tools, and organized album sections (ceremony, reception). Deployment is simple with Docker—minimal server setup needed—perfect for couples wanting private, cost-free memory storage without relying on proprietary services like WedPics.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
wedding_share:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: wedding-share
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Guest uploads via QR code or direct link
- Password-protected private albums
- Responsive mobile-friendly interface
- Docker-based one-click deployment
- Comment and like functionality for media
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is WeddingShare hard to install?
WeddingShare uses Docker for deployment—with basic Docker knowledge, you can set it up in minutes using the provided docker-compose file. No complex dependencies are required.
? Is it a good alternative to WedPics?
Yes! Unlike WedPics (subscription-based with third-party data storage), WeddingShare is free, self-hosted, and keeps your photos private. It offers similar guest upload features plus full control over your data.
? Is it completely free?
Absolutely. WeddingShare is open-source under the MIT License—you can use, modify, and self-host it without any cost. No premium features are locked behind paywalls.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about WeddingShare
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Privacy-focused (self-hosted data ownership)
- ⊕ No subscription fees or hidden costs
- ⊕ Simplified guest participation
- ⊕ Customizable album sections
Cons
- ⊖ Requires basic Docker/server knowledge
- ⊖ No built-in cloud backup (depends on user setup)
- ⊖ Limited third-party integration options