WeeWX
Self-HostedOpen-source weather station software for data logging and reporting
Overview
WeeWX is an open-source weather station tool that logs, processes, and visualizes data from hundreds of compatible models (Davis, Oregon Scientific, Netatmo). It generates customizable HTML/CSS reports with graphs, exports data to CSV/JSON, and integrates with services like Weather Underground or CWOP. Deployable on Linux, macOS, or Windows (via WSL), it offers Docker options for easy setup. Lightweight and low-resource, it gives full control over weather data without relying on paid SaaS platforms, ideal for hobbyists and self-hosters.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
weewx:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: weewx
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Supports 100+ weather station models
- Customizable reports with graphs and metrics
- Data export to CSV/JSON and third-party integrations
- Cross-platform deployment (Linux/macOS/Windows WSL)
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is WeeWX hard to install?
WeeWX has detailed step-by-step documentation for Linux, macOS, and Windows (via WSL). Docker images are also available for simpler deployment. Basic command-line skills are helpful, but the guides make it accessible for most self-hosters.
? Is it a good alternative to Davis WeatherLink?
Yes—WeeWX fully supports Davis stations and offers similar logging/reporting features without subscription costs. It’s more customizable but lacks WeatherLink’s native cloud sync (though plugins can add cloud integration).
? Is it completely free?
Yes—WeeWX is licensed under GPLv3, so it’s free to use, modify, and distribute with no hidden fees or paid tiers.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about WeeWX
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Full ownership of weather data
- ⊕ No subscription fees
- ⊕ Extensive plugin ecosystem for added functionality
- ⊕ Lightweight resource footprint
Cons
- ⊖ Requires basic command-line setup knowledge
- ⊖ Default UI is functional but lacks modern SaaS polish
- ⊖ Some advanced integrations need manual plugin installation