bittorrent-tracker
Self-HostedOpen-source BitTorrent tracker for peer-to-peer file sharing networks
Overview
A lightweight, open-source BitTorrent tracker designed to enable peer-to-peer file sharing networks. Supports HTTP/HTTPS, UDP, and WebSocket protocols for broad compatibility with BitTorrent clients. Features customizable announce intervals, peer limits, and timeout settings. Ideal for running private or public networks with full control over tracking infrastructure. Deploy via Docker for quick setup or compile from source (requires Node.js). Lightweight design ensures minimal resource usage, making it suitable for small servers or cloud instances.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
bittorrent_tracker:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: bittorrent-tracker
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Supports HTTP/HTTPS, UDP, and WebSocket protocols
- Customizable announce intervals and peer limits
- Lightweight and resource-efficient
- Docker and source code deployment options
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is bittorrent-tracker hard to install?
It’s straightforward—deploy via Docker with a single command, or compile from source using Node.js. Basic network knowledge (like port forwarding for public access) is recommended but not mandatory for private networks.
? Is it a good alternative to proprietary public trackers?
Yes—if you want to avoid relying on third-party services, run a private network, or customize tracker settings. It’s free and open-source, unlike some commercial options that charge for private tracker access.
? Is it completely free?
Absolutely. bittorrent-tracker is licensed under MIT, so it’s free to use, modify, and distribute without any hidden fees or subscription costs.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about bittorrent-tracker
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Open-source with MIT License (free to use/modify)
- ⊕ Multi-protocol support for wide client compatibility
- ⊕ Full control over tracker infrastructure
- ⊕ Minimal resource footprint for small servers
Cons
- ⊖ Requires server setup and network configuration (port forwarding)
- ⊖ No built-in user interface for monitoring
- ⊖ Limited beginner-friendly documentation
- ⊖ Public trackers may attract legal scrutiny depending on use case