Cgit
Self-HostedLightweight web interface for Git repositories
Overview
Cgit is a fast, minimal web interface for Git repositories, focused on simplicity and performance. It provides core Git browsing features: repository listing, commit history viewing, diff comparisons, RSS feeds for updates, and support for multiple repos. Deployable via CGI with common web servers (Apache, Nginx), it’s ideal for teams or individuals needing an efficient, self-hosted way to share and manage Git projects without heavy dependencies.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
cgit:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: cgit
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Lightweight & high-performance Git browsing
- Repository listing & commit history viewing
- Diff comparisons & RSS feeds for updates
- CGI deployment with Apache/Nginx
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is Cgit hard to install?
Cgit is straightforward for users familiar with web server configurations. It uses CGI, so you’ll need to set up Apache/Nginx to serve it, then configure the cgitrc file to list your repositories. Pre-built packages are available for most Linux distributions, simplifying installation.
? Is it a good alternative to GitHub for repo browsing?
Cgit excels as a lightweight repo browsing alternative. Unlike GitHub, it focuses solely on Git repository viewing without extra features like issues or CI/CD. It’s perfect if you want a fast, self-hosted solution without the overhead of full project management platforms.
? Is Cgit completely free?
Yes! Cgit is open source under the GNU General Public License (GPL) v2. It’s free to use, modify, and distribute for personal or commercial purposes with no hidden costs.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about Cgit
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Privacy-focused self-hosted solution
- ⊕ Minimal resource usage (ideal for low-power servers)
- ⊕ No unnecessary bloat or extra features
Cons
- ⊖ Lacks advanced project management features (issues, CI/CD)
- ⊖ Requires external authentication setup (no built-in)
- ⊖ Limited customization options compared to full-stack tools