gobookmarks
Self-HostedOpen-source self-hosted bookmark manager for personal dashboards
Overview
gobookmarks is a lightweight, self-hosted bookmark manager tailored for personal dashboard integration. It allows users to organize bookmarks into folders, add tags, and perform fast searches. Deployable via Docker for hassle-free setup, it supports importing/exporting bookmarks from browsers like Chrome and Firefox. The clean, minimal interface fits seamlessly into personal dashboards, with customization options for display. It prioritizes data privacy by storing all bookmarks locally, using SQLite as a default database. Ideal for users seeking control over their bookmark data without relying on cloud services.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
gobookmarks:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: gobookmarks
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Organize bookmarks into folders and tags
- Quick search and filter functionality
- Docker-based deployment for easy setup
- Import/export from popular web browsers
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is gobookmarks hard to install?
No—gobookmarks offers Docker deployment with a simple docker-compose command, making setup straightforward. Documentation also covers non-Docker installations for users who prefer manual setup.
? Is it a good alternative to Pocket?
Yes, for users prioritizing self-hosting and privacy. Unlike Pocket, gobookmarks keeps data local but lacks features like read-it-later article saving or social sharing.
? Is it completely free?
Yes—gobookmarks is open-source under the MIT License, so it’s free to use, modify, and self-host without any hidden costs or subscriptions.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about gobookmarks
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Privacy-focused (local data storage)
- ⊕ Lightweight and fast performance
- ⊕ Minimal resource usage
- ⊕ Customizable display options
Cons
- ⊖ Limited advanced features compared to SaaS tools
- ⊖ Requires basic server knowledge for self-hosting
- ⊖ No built-in cross-device sync (manual import/export needed)
- ⊖ Smaller community support than larger alternatives