Heimdall
Self-HostedOpen-source personal dashboard for organizing your web apps and bookmarks
Overview
Heimdall centralizes access to self-hosted services, SaaS apps, and bookmarks in a clean, customizable interface. It supports custom icons, category grouping, search functionality, and dark mode. Integration with tools like Plex and Nextcloud allows status previews or quick actions. Deployment is simple via Docker, Docker Compose, or traditional PHP/MySQL setups. Lightweight and resource-efficient, it’s ideal for streamlining access to all your digital tools without browser clutter.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
heimdall:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: heimdall
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Centralized app & bookmark management
- Custom icons and category organization
- Service status integration (Plex, Nextcloud, etc.)
- Docker-friendly deployment
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is Heimdall hard to install?
No—Heimdall is easy to deploy via Docker (recommended) with a single command or Docker Compose. It also supports traditional PHP/MySQL installation for users who prefer that route.
? Is it a good alternative to Start.me?
Yes—Heimdall is a strong self-hosted alternative to Start.me. Unlike Start.me's cloud-based model, Heimdall keeps your data private on your server, with similar core features plus integration with self-hosted services.
? Is Heimdall completely free?
Yes—Heimdall is open-source under the MIT License, so it’s 100% free to use, modify, and self-host without any hidden costs.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about Heimdall
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Privacy-focused (self-hosted)
- ⊕ No subscription fees
- ⊕ Clean and intuitive UI
- ⊕ Lightweight resource usage
Cons
- ⊖ Requires server or Docker setup
- ⊖ No native mobile app (responsive design only)
- ⊖ Limited advanced analytics compared to proprietary alternatives