Restreamer
Self-HostedOpen-source video streaming server for live multi-platform or self-hosted broadcasts
Overview
Restreamer is an open-source video streaming server enabling live broadcasts from IP cameras, webcams, or other sources to platforms like YouTube, Twitch, or self-hosted endpoints. It uses Docker for quick deployment, featuring a user-friendly web UI for stream management, real-time transcoding (adapting to devices/protocols), and on-demand recording. Compatible with RTSP, RTMP, HLS, and WebRTC, it gives full control over workflows without relying on third-party SaaS, ideal for privacy-focused users or small teams.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
restreamer:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: restreamer
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Multi-platform streaming to popular services or self-hosted endpoints
- Docker-based deployment for simplified setup
- Support for RTSP, RTMP, HLS, and WebRTC protocols
- Real-time transcoding and on-demand recording options
- Intuitive web UI for stream management and monitoring
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is Restreamer hard to install?
No—Restreamer uses Docker, so you can deploy it with a single command. The web interface guides you through setting up sources and streams, making it accessible for users with basic Docker knowledge.
? Is it a good alternative to Restream (SaaS)?
Yes—Restreamer offers multi-platform streaming like Restream but is self-hosted, avoiding monthly costs and retaining content control. However, it requires your own server and bandwidth unlike Restream’s managed service.
? Is it completely free?
Yes—Restreamer is open source under the MIT License, so it’s free to use, modify, and distribute. All core features (streaming, transcoding, recording) are available without paid tiers.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about Restreamer
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Full data privacy and control via self-hosting
- ⊕ No subscription fees (100% open source)
- ⊕ Wide range of input/output protocol support
- ⊕ Docker deployment reduces installation complexity
Cons
- ⊖ Requires server resources (CPU/GPU) for transcoding
- ⊖ Bandwidth needs scale with number of streams and quality
- ⊖ Advanced features may need technical configuration knowledge