SCM Manager
Self-HostedOpen-source self-hosted repository manager for Git, Mercurial & Subversion
Overview
SCM Manager is a lightweight, self-hosted tool for managing Git, Mercurial, and Subversion repositories. It features an intuitive web interface, role-based access control (RBAC) for secure collaboration, and support for CI/CD integrations (e.g., Jenkins) and custom hooks. Deploy easily via Docker, WAR file, or binary package—setup takes minutes even for non-technical users. Ideal for teams wanting full control over their codebase without relying on cloud-based repo services.
Self-Hosting Resources
Below is a reference structure for docker-compose.yml.
⚠️ Do NOT run blindly. Replace placeholders with official values.
version: '3'
services:
scm_manager:
image: <OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME>:latest
container_name: scm-manager
ports:
- "8080:<APP_INTERNAL_PORT>"
volumes:
- ./data:/app/data
restart: unless-stopped Key Features
- Supports Git, Mercurial & Subversion repositories
- Role-based access control (RBAC) for secure team collaboration
- Easy integration with CI/CD pipelines and custom hooks
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is SCM Manager hard to install?
No—SCM Manager offers simple deployment options like Docker containers, WAR files, or binary packages. The Docker setup is especially easy: pull the official image and run it with minimal configuration for basic use cases.
? Is it a good alternative to GitHub for self-hosted repo management?
Yes—for teams needing core repo management features without the overhead of full GitLab. It supports multiple VCS types and RBAC, making it ideal for small to medium teams prioritizing code control over advanced enterprise features.
? Does SCM Manager require any paid licenses?
Yes—SCM Manager is open source under the Apache 2.0 license, so it’s completely free to use, modify, and self-host. There are no paid tiers or hidden costs for its core functionality.
Top Alternatives
People Also Ask about SCM Manager
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Full control over codebase (self-hosted)
- ⊕ Lightweight and low-resource usage
Cons
- ⊖ Lacks advanced enterprise features (e.g., built-in CI runners)
- ⊖ Limited third-party integrations compared to cloud-based tools