Gerrit
Self-HostedOpen-source code review and project management tool for Git repositories
Overview
Gerrit is an open-source web-based code review and project management tool designed for Git repositories. It enables teams to collaborate on code changes with inline comments, customizable approval workflows, and integration with CI/CD pipelines (e.g., Jenkins). Deployable via Docker, Kubernetes, or manual setup (Java-based), it supports access control lists, change history tracking, and hooks for automated testing. Ideal for enterprise or large teams needing structured review processes, Gerrit integrates seamlessly with GitLab, GitHub, and other version control systems to maintain code quality and streamline development.
Key Features
- Web-based code review with inline comments
- Customizable approval workflows and access controls
- CI/CD pipeline integration (Jenkins, GitLab CI)
- Git repository management and change tracking
- Automated testing hooks
Frequently Asked Questions
? Is Gerrit hard to install?
Gerrit can be installed via Docker (simplified) or manual setup (Java, Git, web server configuration). Docker deployments are straightforward for DevOps teams, but beginners may need to follow detailed documentation. Kubernetes support is also available for scalable deployments.
? Is it a good alternative to GitHub Pull Requests?
Yes—Gerrit offers more granular approval workflows and access controls than GitHub PRs, making it ideal for enterprise teams with strict review requirements. However, GitHub PRs are more user-friendly for casual collaboration, so Gerrit is better suited for formal, large-scale projects.
? Is Gerrit completely free?
Gerrit is open-source under the Apache License 2.0, so it is completely free to use, modify, and self-host. There are no licensing fees or subscription costs for the core tool.
Top Alternatives
Tool Info
Pros
- ⊕ Completely free and open-source
- ⊕ Granular access controls for enterprise teams
- ⊕ Seamless integration with popular DevOps tools
- ⊕ Formal review processes to maintain code quality
Cons
- ⊖ Steeper learning curve for beginners
- ⊖ Requires server maintenance (Docker/Kubernetes or manual setup)
- ⊖ Less intuitive UI compared to casual tools like GitHub PRs
- ⊖ Limited built-in project management beyond code review